Infant Mortality in South Africa – Distribution, Associations and Policy Implications, 2007: An Ecological Spatial Analysis

International Journal of Health GeographicsInternational Journal of Health Geographics, 10:61, Published 18 November 2011

Benn KD Sartorius, Kurt Sartorius, Tobias F Chirwa, and Sharon Fonn

“Background: Many sub-Saharan countries are confronted with persistently high levels of infant mortality because of the impact of a range of biological and social determinants. In particular, infant mortality has increased in sub-Saharan Africa in recent decades due to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The geographic distribution of health problems and their relationship to potential risk factors can be invaluable for cost effective intervention planning. The objective of this paper is to determine and map the spatial nature of infant mortality in South Africa at a sub district level in order to inform policy intervention. In particular, the paper identifies and maps high risk clusters of infant mortality, as well as examines the impact of a range of determinants on infant mortality. A Bayesian approach is used to quantify the spatial risk of infant mortality, as well as significant associations (given spatial correlation between neighbouring areas) between infant mortality and a range of determinants. The most attributable determinants in each sub-district are calculated based on a combination of prevalence and model risk factor coefficient estimates. This integrated small area approach can be adapted and applied in other high burden settings to assist intervention planning and targeting.

Risk indicators with highest attributable fractions (impact) in significantly high risk infant mortality sub-districts, South Africa, 2007

Risk indicators with highest attributable fractions (impact) in significantly high risk infant mortality sub-districts, South Africa, 2007

“Results: Infant mortality remains high in South Africa with seemingly little reduction since previous estimates in the early 2000’s. Results showed marked geographical differences in infant mortality risk between provinces as well as within provinces as well as significantly higher risk in specific sub-districts and provinces. A number of determinants were found to have a significant adverse influence on infant mortality at the sub-district level. Following multivariable adjustment increasing maternal mortality, antenatal HIV prevalence, previous sibling mortality and male infant gender remained significantly associated with increased infant mortality risk. Of these antenatal HIV sero-prevalence, previous sibling mortality and maternal mortality were found to be the most attributable respectively.

“Conclusions: This study demonstrates the usefulness of advanced spatial analysis to both quantify excess infant mortality risk at the lowest administrative unit, as well as the use of Bayesian modelling to quantify determinant significance given spatial correlation. The “novel” integration of determinant prevalence at the sub-district and coefficient estimates to estimate attributable fractions further elucidates the “high impact” factors in particular areas and has considerable potential to be applied in other locations. The usefulness of the paper, therefore, not only suggests where to intervene geographically, but also what specific interventions policy makers should prioritize in order to reduce the infant mortality burden in specific administration areas.”

URISA Publishes 2011 Salary Survey for GIS Professionals

URISAURISA is pleased to announce the results of its latest salary survey for GIS professionals. The 2011 publication has been further expanded and includes a much wider-range of detailed information. Additions include more job titles and information pertaining to the increase/decrease of department size, professional certification, specific technical skills and soft skills and salary information. This is an ideal resource for both job seekers and also for those who are hiring GIS staff in 2012.

For a limited time, those who purchase the 2011 salary survey will also receive a copy of the 2007 salary survey (while quantities last). The publication is available on CD to URISA International members for $99 and Nonmembers for $199.

The 2011 Salary Survey addresses the following questions:

  • How have salary levels changed since 2007?
  • Have GIS departments increased in size?
  • Are more non-technical skills required?
  • What GIS software proficiencies are necessary?
  • What benefits do employers typically offer?
  • How long is the average workweek?
  • How has GIS certification impacted salaries?
  • Are GIS professionals actively pursuing continuing education?

Here’s a preview of information included in this year’s Salary Survey:

  • GISPs, on average, earned $10,000 more than non-GISPs
  • The average salary of survey respondents was $61,540 – an increase of 2.5%
  • GIS Managers saw a 3.8% increase in salary in 2010-2011 – from $67,302 to $69,842
  • Over 65% of respondents are employed within some level of government, from local to federal agencies
  • Most respondents to this survey hold GIS-related titles, with many possessing management responsibilities

The URISA Salary Survey debuted in 1998 to keep GIS and IT Professionals informed of the latest information related to salary, required skills, job advancement and professional certification. To purchase the URISA 2011 Salary Survey for GIS Professionals, or for additional information, please visit www.urisa.org/2011SalarySurvey .

[Source: URISA press release]