New Tools Enable Public Participation in GIS Database Development

For many years ESRI has promoted the idea of “GIS for everyone”, and more recently the pace of this movement has accelerated thanks to the Internet.  We tend to think of “GIS for everyone” as broad, practically universal access to data and GIS/mapping tools.   But another facet is public participation in that fundamental, essential component of GIS—building and maintaining the geospatial database.

Traditionally, geospatial database are “owned” by the creators of the geographic knowledge, which are typically the individuals or groups charged with building and maintaining the databases that support their organizational missions.  These databases are considered “authoritative,” meaning that they meet the standards of the organizational creators and are suitable to meet the needs of their intended applications.  But this database workflow has its critics.  “One of the criticisms leveled at GIS has been its insistence on a single point of view,” said Michael Goodchild, professor of geography at University of California, Santa Barbara.  To address such criticism, Goodchild says that we need a framework “in which individuals are able to assert their own views of their surroundings and play a part in local decision making.”

In the GIS realm, user-generated content (UGC) refers to geographic knowledge created by “end users” or the general public.  UGC is considered “assertive” geospatial data; while the provider of the data may be confident in its accuracy, this does not necessarily guarantee the data meets the information standards of the organization, or that it is suitable for the intended application.

Concerns about UGC are many.  In contrast to GIS-based data, which is organized with consistent data models and collected systematically, UGC is mostly observational, qualitative, and very rarely collected systematically in a science-based framework. It typically does not have an organized foundation, nor is it associated with metadata, and there is no responsibility with respect to the organization or individual who reported it.

So is there value in UGC in a GIS environment?   Yes.  There are many ways that GIS users can take advantage of the rapidly growing amount of UGC on the Web. They include:

  • Using the data to validate data analysis and compilation efforts
  • Using geotagged photos to enrich the multimedia dimension of a GIS
  • Associating the observational data to other layers for query and enrichment of the GIS
  • Integrating citizen/consumer comments with public policy systems
  • Finding suggestions and recommendations about particular places
  • Enhancing the systematic inventories of things like place names and other observational data

This method of collecting observational geographic data and engaging the public is very powerful, especially for community involvement in collaboration and communicating about situational awareness. “I think the most significant new opportunity lies in the fact that a substantial fraction of the human population now has access to mobile phones and, hence, to electronic networks,” said Goodchild.  “Mobile phones could be used to acquire and share damage assessments in the immediate aftermath of a disaster and to develop detailed databases for community planning.”

Structure is Key

The key to useful, actionable UGC is collecting the data in a structured manner.  The USGS-Caltech ‘Recent Earthquakes’ application (http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/) is as an interesting example of how to do this right.  ‘Recent Earthquakes’ lets people report their earthquake experiences over the web, but it doesn’t ask them to rate the intensity of the earthquake directly.  Instead, it walks people through a more objective, structured series of questions to help determine how strongly they felt the earthquake.  “On the back end, the application determines how ‘intense’ the experience was as an aggregate of responses to individual questions,” said Matt Artz, ESRI’s GIS and science marketing manager.  “The web-based map is an interesting and useful service in itself, but potentially even more useful is that the answers to the individual questions also form a very useful data set for further analysis.”

ESRI has been building functionality, such as the new ‘featurelayer’ capabilities in ArcGIS 9.4, to support such structuring of UGC, and Web API’s for capturing UGC are being developed.   Structured user-generated content becomes another geographic layer in the geodatabase.  Advanced applications such as analysis, modeling, forecasting, management, and planning are enabled by structured data.  ESRI will continue to develop enabling technology that builds these concepts into ArcGIS and make it an integral part of the GIS system architecture.

“User created data that’s validated through essentially a cloud framework is going to take over,” said Larry Orman, executive director of Green Info Network.  “You can’t fight with that.  Individuals are really going to play a major role in the way we (create) information.”

 

The Power of the People

“There are already signs that the traditional authorities are willing to work with citizens,” said Goodchild.  “In the UK [United Kingdom], for example, the Ordnance Survey has developed a program that encourages volunteers to provide geographic information about their local communities, and volunteers are playing an increasingly important role in ensuring that authoritative sources of geographic information are accurate and kept up-to-date.”

“Our military has a slogan: ‘Every soldier is a sensor,” said ESRI president Jack Dangermond.  “With UGC, every citizen is a sensor.  This is another chapter in democracy, opening up and letting citizens participate in the development of geographic databases,” said Dangermond.

…from the Water Resources Research journal…

Alexander Zimmermann, Institute of Geoecology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

Beate Zimmermann, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancón, Panama

Helmut Elsenbeer, Institute of Geoecology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancón, Panama

“The investigation of throughfall patterns has received considerable interest over the last decades. And yet, the geographical bias of pertinent previous studies and their methodologies and approaches to data analysis cast a doubt on the general validity of claims regarding spatial and temporal patterns of throughfall. We employed 220 collectors in a 1-ha plot of semideciduous tropical rain forest in Panama and sampled throughfall during a period of 14 months. Our analysis of spatial patterns is based on 60 data sets, whereas the temporal analysis comprises 91 events. Both data sets show skewed frequency distributions. When skewness arises from large outliers, the classical, nonrobust variogram estimator overestimates the sill variance and, in some cases, even induces spurious autocorrelation structures. In these situations, robust variogram estimation techniques offer a solution. Throughfall in our plot typically displayed no or only weak spatial autocorrelations. In contrast, temporal correlations were strong, that is, wet and dry locations persisted over consecutive wet seasons. Interestingly, seasonality and hence deciduousness had no influence on spatial and temporal patterns. We argue that if throughfall patterns are to have any explanatory power with respect to patterns of near-surface processes, data analytical artifacts must be ruled out lest spurious correlation be confounded with causality; furthermore, temporal stability over the domain of interest is essential.”

…from the ESRI Map Book, Volume 24

conservation1_sm“Arizona’s natural infrastructure includes lands and waters that preserve the state’s natural heritage and open space. The Nature Conservancy developed a natural infrastructure dataset by integrating twelve regional studies on wildlife habitat and open space and used the dataset to understand the potential impacts of Arizona’s future growth by 2050.

“Results show that although Arizona’s population is projected to double by 2050, its associated urban footprint may quadruple. If growth follows current projections, Arizona could lose nearly two million acres of natural infrastructure by 2050. This loss of desert, grassland, and forest habitat could jeopardize at least 120 species.

“However, there are 2.7 million acres of undeveloped private and state lands outside of the natural infrastructure and within 30 miles of existing highways. Shifting projected development into these areas would minimize direct impacts to the natural infrastructure.

“Courtesy of The Nature Conservancy.”

Hugh Keegan is interviewed by Nick Chrisman for his 2006 ESRI Press book “Charting the Unknown: How Computer Mapping at Harvard Became GIS.”

Hugh Keegan was a research assistant at the Harvard Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis, and is now manager of the Applications Prototype Lab at ESRI.

“The 33rd Applied Geography Conference will be held in Fort Worth, TX 21 – 23 October 2010.

“The Applied Geography Conferences have provided a forum for the exchange and critique of ideas related to the application of geographic concepts, analytical techniques, data, and methods since 1978. The conference brings together practitioners, academicians, and other professionals who seek geographic solutions and explanations to societal problems. Attendance ranges between 250 and 400 people. This size meeting offers an ideal setting for new professional geographers and students to gain public speaking experience and share ideas with geographers from business, government agencies, and academic institutions. In addition to paper sessions, the Conference also features exhibits, student poster presentations, field trips, special events and selected papers are peer-reviewed and published in the Papers of Applied Geography Conferences.”

aag“Start making plans for the 2010 AAG Annual Meeting in Washington, DC, home of the Association of American Geographers and the heart of the U.S. Federal Government.

“In addition to many scholarly presentations, the 2010 Meeting will feature opportunities for interactions with government agencies and will include keynote speakers from nonprofit groups and other influential nongovernmental organizations located in the nation’s capital. The District of Columbia is home to 174 foreign embassies, many high profile NGOs, and numerous universities.”

“Geography and Climate Change” has been designated as a key overarching theme of the 2010 AAG Annual meeting.

“MapAction delivers information that saves lives and livelihoods. When disasters strike, coordinating relief efforts hinges on rapid transfer of information. MapAction delivers that vital situation information in the form of maps, created and distributed in the field. By conveying a “common operational picture”, our maps make a crucial difference in delivering humanitarian aid to the right place to relieve suffering.

“MapAction is unique. We are the only non-governmental organisation (NGO) with a substantial track record in mapping for disaster emergencies. From our bases in the UK, Germany and the Caribbean region, we can deploy a fully trained and equipped mapping team anywhere in the world. They can be on their way in hours.”

…from NPR

“Biologist Kristin Politano taps a canister of sediment to get oxygen bubbles to rise. She learned about nutrient pollution in Florida, but in some ways it’s the same in the Chesapeake. Scientists can map the pollution hot spots, but someone has to follow them back to source to fix the problem.

“”It all boils down to what we’re actually putting into the watershed,” says Politano. “People get upset about what’s going on in the bay. What they have to realize is that a lot of the problems are coming from the upper watershed themselves. You have to look at restoring headwaters and streams, and rivers and things like that before you are going to see an improvement in the water quality that’s coming into the bay.”"

14th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling: Theory, modeling and concepts in Geospatial Information Science

The Joint International Conference on Theory, Data Handling and Modelling in GeoSpatial Information Science will be held on May 26th to 28th 2010 in Hong Kong. This conference will be a major event in the international community of Geo-spatial information Science (GISc) in 2010, organized by: Commission II of the International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) and Commission of Geographic Information Science and Commission of Modelling Geographical Systems of the International Geographical Union (IGU). The conference will join together the Symposium of Technical Commission II of ISPRS, the Symposium on Spatial Data Handling and the Conference on Modelling Geographical Systems from IGU.

ISPRS is a society regrouping scientific societies from more than 100 countries working in domains related to photogrammetry, remote sensing and geographical information science. 2010 will be a special year for the society as it will be celebrating its centenary anniversary. The SPRS Technical Commission II Symposium is organised every four years alternately with the ISPRS Congress and is among the major events in ISPRS calendar regrouping leading scholars from the GISc and related communities. Last editions of the symposium were held in Ottawa, Canada (2002) and Vienna, Austria (2006) jointly with SDH.

The 14th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH) is the premier biennial international research forum for Geospatial Information Science (GISc). It commenced in 1984, in Zurich, Switzerland and has been held in Seattle, USA; Sydney, Australia; Zurich, Switzerland; Charleston, USA; Edinburgh, UK; Delft, The Netherlands; Vancouver, Canada; Beijing, China; Ottawa, Canada; Leicester, UK; Vienna, Austria; and Montpellier, France.

The main objective is to bring together scholars and professionals from the international community of GISc to present latest achievements and to share experience in GISc research. The conference program will feature keynote speeches delivered by leading GISc scholars, technical sessions with reports of the latest research outcomes, student forum on meeting with GISc legends and commercial exhibitions showing the latest development of GISc technology.

“The Atlas is an interactive application of the renewable energy resources in the contiguous United States, Alaska and Hawaii. It illustrates the geographic distribution of wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass resources, as well as other pertinent information such as transportation network and administrative boundaries. The Atlas is for anyone interested in renewable energy in the country, including researchers, developers, and policy makers.”

NREL-1

Calendar

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Archives